Essay PreviewMore ↓
Elections are being affected by the way people stand on this issue. After the 1992 election, President Clinton, who is said by Human Events to be the most "pro-gay President in history," adamantly tried to abolish the ban on gays in the military. This was a victory cry for many homosexual activists. Then in the 1996 election, President Clinton admitted he would not openly oppose the bill in Congress that defines marriage as "a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife" ("Same-sex Marriage Imperils the Family"). President Clinton, who generally supports gay rights, gives Americans a reason to believe that perhaps gay marriage is one step too far. Even First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton agreed that marriage should be a union of a man and a woman in her statement, "Marriage has got historic, religious, and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been: between a man and a woman" (State of the Union").
In the recent 2000 Election, both George W. Bush and Al Gore agree with the Defense of Marriage act (DOMA), which "implies that allowing homosexuals to marry constituted an 'attack' on the existing institution" ("State of the Union"). It is difficult to find many issues with which these two candidates can agree. So, it seems that since they do agree, we can assume that a gay marriage would in fact intrude upon the values of not only marriage but also we as a people.
How to Cite this Page
"Gay Marriage Should NOT Be Legal." 123HelpMe.com. 22 Jan 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... The choice of marriage should not be gender specific. Based on the legal definition of marriage, it is an individual’s choice to be united and enjoy the rights and privileges of such union under the law. According to the state of California’s definition of marriage, “marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil contract between two persons…” Based on the State of California’s definition of marriage, there is no mention that the two person’s need to be of opposite sex. By following the letter of the law, same sex couples can marry.... [tags: Homosexuality, Same-sex marriage, LGBT, Gay]
1031 words (2.9 pages)
- We live in a very controversial time when it comes to same sex marriages. This issue is one of the most widely discussed controversies along with what rights they deserve and what rights they should be denied. Straight people have very opposing beliefs on this topic, some believe gays are given far too few rights and should be granted ultimate freedom while others believe gays already have enough rights and the debate should end now. This is why our nation is so at war with this issue. The research found explains if marital and family status influence same sex marriages, gay rights, laws on marriage, the strength of gay marriage, and how the government is working to expand gay marriage right... [tags: Same-sex marriage, Homosexuality, Marriage]
1575 words (4.5 pages)
- Gay Marriage It seems like all we have heard about for the past year is gay marriage, right. Comments such as: should two people of the same sexual orientation be permitted to unite as one, if two people of the same sex are intimate then they are promiscuous and unworthy of god, and that is not in the definition of marriage. They are just a few of the debates out there today on this topic. I see it as the saying I heard many times growing up “to each is their own”. Who am I to decide if a woman being with a woman, or man being with a man is right or wrong.... [tags: Homosexuality, Marriage, Same-sex marriage]
779 words (2.2 pages)
- ... The infringement of a person’s rights has got its own consequences that are equally justifiable to the actions. Likewise, the denial of the right for marriage to same sex couples is a form of stigmatization to the couple which is a bias action that leads them as inferior in the society. Denial of their right to marriage rights is a violation against their constitutional right that leads to the prosecution of the defendant. This act may amount to other crimes which include the discrimination against the gay and the lesbians.... [tags: Homosexuality, Same-sex marriage, Marriage, Law]
1090 words (3.1 pages)
- Introduction “Do you, take him to be your lawfully wedded husband. Do you love, comfort, honor and keep him, in sickness and in health, for richer or for poorer for as long as you both shall live?” (“DOTCOMWOMEN”) This is just one of the traditional speeches you might have heard in a normal wedding when a couple is pronounced husband and wife. How different would it be if it were for a same-sex marriage. Define ‘marriage: Firstly, what is marriage. Basically, the definition of marriage varies with cultures and views.... [tags: Same-Sex Marriage Essays]
2166 words (6.2 pages)
- Ive always considered myself a moderate in more situations than just politics, but for the sake of this assignment I will call myself a Democrat. I believe in a lot of things similar to that of a Democrat. Im pro-choice, I believe gay marriage should be legal, and I support their healthcare policies. I believe Obamacare was a good decision for this Nation. I think everyone should be partially taken care of by this country. At the least, have healthcare guaranteed to them. I think that women should be the only people with a say of what happens to their bodies.... [tags: Same-sex marriage, Homosexuality, Democratic Party]
944 words (2.7 pages)
- Should Gay Marriage Be Legal. Macklamore and Ryan Lewis’s music supports a lot of different things. They rap about lots of things. They could always stick to the status quote and rap about money, girls and fame but instead they choose to write their music about topics that actually matter to Americans. Macklamore, and Ryan Lewis’s music has up bringing beats about human rights and wanting to see people equal. Although he sees every human being as being equal, his mission through his writing and singing is to have people change their point of view and to have the government change their laws to allow two people of the same-sex, two women, or two men to get married.... [tags: same-sex-marriages, democrats]
1954 words (5.6 pages)
- 'Would legalization of gay marriage be good for the gay community?' Sam Isaacson wrote an article analyzing the opinion of the gay community on legalizing same sex marriages. It is somewhat of a controversial issue with the gay community whether or not marriage is a good thing. He divides the community into two groups: integrationists and liberationists. The controversy is caused because of these two different philosophical views. The integrationists want to be as normal as can be. They want to 'integrate' themselves into society.... [tags: Papers Gay Marriage Homosexual Essays]
605 words (1.7 pages)
- On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry in all 50 US states. Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy stated in the majority opinion: "The court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry. No longer may this liberty be denied to them." Many conservatives are completely against gay marriage and they have stated that they will fight to have the Supreme Court ruling overturned. Christian politicians are using religious arguments to establish that homosexuality is an abomination.... [tags: Social Issues Gay Marriage Essays]
1537 words (4.4 pages)
- On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Many conservative groups do NOT agree with this decision. The believe that gay marriage should not be permitted but civil unions should be granted to lesbians and homosexuals. On the other hand there is a large group that believes neither gay marriage nor civil unions should be offered to gay and lesbian couples and that any legal union should be available to heterosexual couples only.... [tags: Same-Sex Marriage Essays]
1125 words (3.2 pages)
As of now, thirty states acknowledge marriage only as a union of a man and a woman, yet not one of the fifty states officially recognize the marriage of two members of the same sex. Vermont, Alaska and Hawaii all considered legalizing same-sex marriages, but none have been successful. One of the most shocking states is California. California voters voted in favor of a ballot that acknowledges only the marriage of a man and a woman. This decision in California is a disappointment for gay marriage advocates. California is a state famous for voicing its opinions on the issues and we have its opinion on this issue. The ballot was decisive with a 61 percent-to-39 percent marginal win ("A 'No' to Gay Marriage"). The values of traditional marriage are still being upheld even in states that are traditionally pro-gay.
Throughout the court rulings and legislation, we have to look at the pros and cons of this issue. I would like to discuss the pros and cons list published by U.S. News and World Report. One pro for same-sex marriage says, "banning same-sex marriage is discriminatory." This pro says marriage is a "right and should not be denied to any individual." This argument goes on to compare same-sex marriages with other minorities who have been denied marriage in the past history of our nation ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?"). Some heterosexual minorities may be offended by the fact they are grouped with the homosexual minority. Is that not also discriminating? Is banning same-sex marriage really discriminatory? Throughout history groups of people have, are, and will be denied their wants, but does this mean they are being discriminated against?
Another pro for same-sex marriages?it "supports stability." It stabilizes by allowing gays and lesbians to enjoy the same level of commitment that heterosexual couples share. It goes on to say that same-sex marragies should be endorsed by religious conservatives as an "endorsement of traditional values." It also says that marriage would promote "stability and long-term commitment" ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?"). Same-sex marriages are not traditional, and thus would not be an endorsement of traditional values. Marriage is not the solution to keeping people together; even heterosexual couples cannot turn to marriage as a way to keep them together. Marriage is a blessed union that should be the result of a committed relationship and a life-long commitment before the ceremony ever takes place. Marriage cannot solve problems or promise a life-long commitment?as heterosexual marriage demonstrates. Couples can, however, promise to work through problems and gain a life-long commitment through hard work and unfailing love.
Tax benefits are also listed under the pros of same-sex marriage. It is said that marriage would legally pressure those in same-sex marriage "to care for a loved one 'in sickness and in health.'" This may be true, but tax dollars will also be spent on federal benefits and tax breaks. The federal treasury will be forced to subtract from its already burdened balance.
Another pro says, "religious values shouldn't dictate who gets married." This argument is backed by the separation of church and state. It does not believe that a civil marriage should be denied but that a religious marriage would still be left up to the religious groups. Some religious groups may want to perform them. "The decision to marry should belong to the individual, not the government, religious groups or political extremists" ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?"). If the decision to marry belongs solely to the individual, does the decision to steal, murder, or lie also belong to the individual?
The first con of same-sex marriage states that "heterosexual marriage is sacred." U.S. News and World Report writes that "same-sex marriage is a violation of basic biblical tenets. No culture has endorsed the idea of men marrying men or women marrying women. . . Marriage as an institution already threatened by divorce and by the erosion of religion and family values." If same-sex marriages are legalized, what comes next ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal"?)?
"One state court should not dictate marriage laws for the entire nation." The U. S. Constitution calls for each state to give "full faith and credit" to decisions of other states. If one state legalized same-sex marriages, the other 49 states can be forced to recognize the court decisions of one state.
"Marriage is about procreation." Marriage rights and privileges are fixed on the presupposition that married couples will have children and raise them as law-abiding citizens. Some heterosexual couples do not and will not have children, but the government cannot ask couples what their plans for reproduction will be. Allowing the legalization of same-sex marriages will only further the deterioration of marriage as an institution ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?").
The last con relates back to the tax benefit pro. "Marriage benefits cost money." Same-sex couples would enjoy the federal benefits and tax breaks just like heterosexual couples do. Tax dollars would be going to lifestyles with which not all taxpayers agree ("Should Gay Marriage be Legal?").
As I end this essay, I would like to explain why and what I believe and why I believe it. I would like to share my firm foundation. I realize not all my readers will agree with me or hold my same beliefs, but please hear my case.
I do not believe that homosexuals are bad people. A homosexual is not worse than a heterosexual or vice versa. "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23 KJV). We are all the same. I do believe that the act of homosexuality is wrong, just as is murder, stealing, lying, and adultery. No sin is above another. I also believe that the Bible is very clear about God's view on homosexuality. Romans 1:24-28 reads,
Wherefore God also gave them up to the uncleanness through the lusts of
their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves; who
changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the
creature, more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen. For this
cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did
change the natural use into what is against nature: and likewise also the
men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust toward one
another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving
themselves that recompense of their error which was meet. And even as
they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to
a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient.
In closing, I hope that this gives you a few of the reasons same-sex marriage would be destructive to the traditional, moral, and legal foundation of marriage. There are political, economical and moral issues at hand. This is not an easy issue or light issue and must be carefully thought out before a life-long decision is made. Please consider the issue and stakes at hand as you form your own firm foundation.
Holy Bible?King James Version. Iowa: Riverside Book and Bible House, 1986.
"Same-sex Marriage Imperils the Family." Human Events. 5 May 1996:3. Online
Source. EBSCO Host. Galileo.
"Should Gay Marriage be Legal?" U.S. News and World Report. 3 June 1996: 31.
Online Source. EBSCO Host. Galileo.
Sullivan, Andrew. "State of the Union." New Republic. May 2000: 18. Online
EBSCO Host. Galileo.
Tharp, Michael. "A 'No" to Gay Marriage." U.S. News and World Report. 3 March
2000: 39. Online Source. EBSCO Host. Galileo.